| |
NFL Forum
Sure
Posted By: Colin Caster In Response To: email stats? (docriver)
Date: 19 Aug 01, 10:13 pm
But it would be much easier if you ran the big correlations first. Know what I mean? Instead of computing a W-W correlation for 97-98 and 98-99 and 99-00 by correlating pairs of columns:
97W 98W 99W 00W
cut and paste your data set so it looks like this:
97W 98W
98W 99W
99W 00Wand compute one big correlation between these two columns. Then do the same for EW-W.
Am I making sense?
CC
- Pythagorean Formula for wins -- docriver -- 16 Aug 01, 12:02 pm
- Pythagorean -- Editor -- 16 Aug 01, 1:33 pm
- tails? -- docriver -- 16 Aug 01, 1:57 pm
- Tails -- Editor -- 16 Aug 01, 3:50 pm
- Starting point -- Colin Caster -- 16 Aug 01, 9:40 pm
- Starting point -- Colin Caster -- 16 Aug 01, 9:40 pm
- Tails -- Editor -- 16 Aug 01, 3:50 pm
- 1988 thru 2000 data -- docriver -- 17 Aug 01, 2:51 pm
- also.. -- docriver -- 17 Aug 01, 3:01 pm
- Nice work! Testing significance of correlation differences -- Colin Caster -- 19 Aug 01, 1:01 pm
- email stats? -- docriver -- 19 Aug 01, 7:18 pm
- Sure -- Colin Caster -- 19 Aug 01, 10:13 pm
- Results (and computation) -- Colin Caster -- 20 Aug 01, 1:02 pm
- Results (and computation) -- Colin Caster -- 20 Aug 01, 1:02 pm
- Sure -- Colin Caster -- 19 Aug 01, 10:13 pm
- Nice work! Testing significance of correlation differences -- Colin Caster -- 19 Aug 01, 1:01 pm
- Re: Bill James -- T. Hopper -- 19 Aug 01, 2:01 pm
- I am told that the exponent for college football is 1.68 (nt) -- Colin Caster -- 19 Aug 01, 10:16 pm
- tails? -- docriver -- 16 Aug 01, 1:57 pm
- Pythagorean -- Editor -- 16 Aug 01, 1:33 pm
| |
NFL Forum is maintained by Pi Yee Press