| |
NFL Forum
Not surprised. Thanks.
Posted By: James In Response To: No, calculations are incorrect (Don Schlesinger)
Date: 1 Aug 01, 10:20 am
Looking back, I have absolutely no clue how I got those numbers; my only guess is I must have gotten formulas tangled up in the Excel spreadsheet I used and failed (as I do too often) to apply the appropriate idiot-filter to my numbers.
Of course, posting on a board with astute mathematical readers is the easiest way to check answers.
- Winning by hitting 52% -- fezzik -- 30 Jul 01, 10:50 pm
- Mathematical analysis -- Don Schlesinger -- 31 Jul 01, 5:37 pm
- Very nice, but what about... -- Flipper -- 31 Jul 01, 6:03 pm
- One more option -- James -- 31 Jul 01, 6:19 pm
- -105 vig -- fezzik -- 31 Jul 01, 6:37 pm
- You can get +100 for NFL bets (nt) -- StevieY -- 31 Jul 01, 7:04 pm
- Has anyone figured out -- James -- 1 Aug 01, 12:25 pm
- Lots of bad bettors -- StevieY -- 1 Aug 01, 3:20 pm
- A possible way -- David Matthews -- 1 Aug 01, 4:57 pm
- I doubt it -- James -- 2 Aug 01, 9:31 am
- Volume :-) (nt) -- Colin Caster -- 1 Aug 01, 6:05 pm
- A possible way -- David Matthews -- 1 Aug 01, 4:57 pm
- +100 NFL -- lepto -- 13 Aug 01, 3:02 am
- Backchannel, please. (nt) -- Colin Caster -- 13 Aug 01, 8:10 pm
- Lots of bad bettors -- StevieY -- 1 Aug 01, 3:20 pm
- Has anyone figured out -- James -- 1 Aug 01, 12:25 pm
- No, calculations are incorrect -- Don Schlesinger -- 31 Jul 01, 8:25 pm
- Not surprised. Thanks. -- James -- 1 Aug 01, 10:20 am
- You can get +100 for NFL bets (nt) -- StevieY -- 31 Jul 01, 7:04 pm
- One more option -- James -- 31 Jul 01, 6:19 pm
- Very nice, but what about... -- Flipper -- 31 Jul 01, 6:03 pm
- Mathematical analysis -- Don Schlesinger -- 31 Jul 01, 5:37 pm
| |
NFL Forum is maintained by Pi Yee Press